Re: Re: dlvorg Can we consider a change with considering what the change means...

From: Denise McCracken (dmcrack@cox.net)
Date: Tue Nov 08 2005 - 14:43:15 CST

• Next message: kate smith: "Re: dlvorg reschedules"
• Previous message: Tina Tawdre: "Re: dlvorg What is the impact of not having DLV after N+I"
• Maybe in reply to: annie@ivgate.omahug.org: "Re: dlvorg Can we consider a change with considering what the change means..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>I don't see how we can exclude any good faith nomination of a new
>timeframe from consideration.

You mean except for February, right? Because that would conflict with
Black History Month.

• Next message: kate smith: "Re: dlvorg reschedules"
• Previous message: Tina Tawdre: "Re: dlvorg What is the impact of not having DLV after N+I"
• Maybe in reply to: annie@ivgate.omahug.org: "Re: dlvorg Can we consider a change with considering what the change means..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 06 2006 - 16:16:52 CDT